|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6. Balance Content with PresentationA standard complaint about student desktop publishing and multimedia presentations is that students spend too much time tinkering with fonts, graphics and layouts and not enough time developing the ideas and content of their presentation. Unfortunately, this criticism also applies to many student Web presentations, "exhibits," and "portfolios," which seem to consist of "my cool links" and little else of consequence. The value of your Web pages to visitors will be in the original content that you contribute to the larger community. One of your primary jobs, therefore, will be to help students strike a better balance between content and presentation and to help them develop the varieties of skills they need to produce meaningful and useful presentations that actually say something. However, the nature of the medium requires you to also attend to the esthetic attributes of a Web presentation: in order to draw readers in, and hold their attention, it must be be both visually and contextually interesting. Consequently, when we look at a student Web project we strive to evaluate the site for both content as well as esthetic presentation. You'll find an example of how we attempted to strike this balance in the discussion of peer review in the International Schools CyberFair peer evaluations which is summarized below. The CyberFair Peer Review Evaluation Rubric is divided into five sections, labeled from "A" to "E". The rubric establishes a score of 5 points for each of the fives sections scored. For scoring purposes, these five sections are grouped into two categories. The chart below shows these two categories and the sections that comprise them, with the maximum points for each: Since a project which draws in visitors and then keeps their interest must be both visually appealing as well as contextually interesting and well-written, there must be a balance between the appearance and the content. Therefore, we use this process when calculating the final scores:
For instance, if the maximum score for This scoring method requires students to pay equal attention to all three categories, since a moderate score in all areas can yield a higher total score than one which is high in one area and low in another. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 1: Define audience and purpose |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global SchoolNet Foundation copyright © 1996-2004 All Rights Reserved Last Update: 02-Dec-2003 |